Posted by nick | Posted in Uncategorized | Posted on Dec 23 2008
For a site that currently has an Alexa traffic ranking of 5, this is pretty dumb. It’s almost as bad as the sporadic errors on myspace. Site maintenance? Really? At 10:45am on a Tuesday? Come’on.. give me a break. Facebook is one of the busiest sites on the net and you disable my account for “a few hours” in the middle of the day? I’d expect they would be able to release code with a “flip of the switch”. If not, I’d expect downtime to be scheduled and during times of minimal traffic.

Posted by nick | Posted in Uncategorized | Posted on Dec 22 2008
I started getting this error for a few days ago now. I simply send a hyperlink to a friend and facebook doesn’t like that. WTF?

12/31/08 Update:
I found a post on Facebook about the issue at http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=18347337130 . Apparently, “if you try to send a message that contains a link to a website with an importer” you’ll get that message. “This response is our way of trying to protect every one’s privacy. Right now, the sites that are asking for this information, and that we are blocking as a result, gain complete access and control over your account”. Okay, but I entered a few different URLs over a time span of a few days and every one of them was blocked. I’m pretty certain it’s a bug.
Posted by nick | Posted in Uncategorized | Posted on Dec 21 2008
Posted by nick | Posted in Email | Posted on Dec 10 2008
I have about ten email accounts and have setup rules to sort mail into folders based on which account the mail is from in Thunderbird. This way, I don’t need an inbox, sent, trash, drafts, etc for every account. They all use a common sent, drafts, and trash folder. The annoying thing is, whenever the mail is moved by a rule into a folder, it sorts them by “order received” after the move, not the date received. My preferences are set to sort by date (view->sort by->date). Outlook does this by default. One of the annoyances I’m experiencing moving from outlook to Thunderbird. Anybody know how to do this without having to click the columns everytime?
Posted by nick | Posted in SVN | Posted on Dec 04 2008
If you’re going to perform a merge, I can assume you’ve already created, checked out, and have made modifications to a branch from your code repository. On your checkout, right click a directory or single file and select “TortoiseSVN” then “Merge” from the context menu.

From the next window, you may need to alter the “From” URL to your repository. This will most likely be pointing to the same directory or single file in the trunk of your repository. For beginners, this can be confusing. What the interface is asking you to do is specify a revision range to merge with your files. In most cases, the “From” and “To” URL will be exactly the same. The difference is the “From” entry where you’ll need to specify the beginning revision number to start the merge. The “To” entry will usually be the “Head Revision” if you’d like to get the most recent commits. The “result of the merge” will automatically point to your branch. Perform a “Dry Run” the first couple times until your comfortable with the process.

Watch for conflicts

Edit and resolve conflicts, then commit all changes to your branch.
